Legal Opinion

Williams v. Crawford

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2002No. S-9791PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is before us for the second time. In Williams v. Crawford, we remanded with instructions that Camille Williams be awarded "one-half of the value of the marital portion of [William MeVey'sl civil service pension-valued as of the date the parties entered into the property settlement agreement, August 12, 1992" 1 On remand, the superior court awarded Camille one-half of the marital share of the pension benefits that William, who died in June 1995, had actually received. Because this award turned on information-the actual date of William's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Boyd v. BoydMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Williams v. CrawfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Moeller-Prokosch v. ProkoschAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ivy v. Calais Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Moody v. Royal Wolf LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Ivy v. Calais Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API