Legal Opinion

Ivy v. Calais Company, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2017No. 7176 S-15967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Deborah Ivy is a shareholder in Calais Company, Inc., a closely held corporation. Ivy sued Calais in 2007 seeking dissolution of the company. The parties settled, and Calais agreed to buy out Ivy’s shares of the company based on a valuation of Calais conducted by a three-member appraisal panel. The appraisers returned an initial valuation in 2009. The superior court approved that valuation, but Calais appealed. We reversed and remanded, concluding that the appraisers had failed to understand their contractually assigned duty. The appraisal panel returned…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. ESTATE OF DAVIS v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  3. Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Williams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Farnsworth v. SteinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Puklich v. PuklichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Leahy v. ConantAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Joshua M. Martinez & Robert Martinez v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Charles E. Burnett v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Reynolds-Rogers v. State, Dept. of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Arcticorp v. C Care Services, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API