Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Bennett

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2000No. S-8959PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Rita Bennett appeals the superior court's denial of her child support reimbursement claim for the year she had de facto custody of her son, but her ex-husband, Albert Bennett, was designated as custodian in a court order. Because child support orders should follow custody orders under the rule articulated in Turinsky v. Long, 1 we affirm the denial of Rita's reimbursement claim. However, we reverse the superior court's retroactive award of child support to Albert for this same time period.

II, FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Rita and Albert Bennett…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Vachon v. PuglieseAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Farrell v. FarrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Turinsky v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Runyon v. Ass'n of Village Council PresidentsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Elton H. v. Naomi R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc. v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ward v. UrlingAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API