Legal Opinion

Moeller-Prokosch v. Prokosch

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 2002No. S-10486PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The main question presented by this case is whether the superior court adequately complied with instructions contained in our prior opinion. For the reasons explained in this opinion we conclude that it did not and remand for further proceedings.

Prior Proceedings

This case is before us for the second time. In our first opinion, 1 we described the initial custody decree of the superior court as follows:

Superior Court Judge Beverly W. Cutler awarded the parties joint legal custody of their son. Faith was awarded primary physical custody. The court set out explicit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. House v. HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Moeller-Prokosch v. ProkoschAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Williams v. CrawfordAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Davis v. HallettAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Silvan v. AlcinaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Veselsky v. VeselskyAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Rego v. RegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Chesser v. Chesser-WitmerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API