Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Wolfe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1999No. S-8130PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

Daniel A. Nicholson appeals the trial court’s division of property. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further consideration.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Deborah K. Wolfe, now in her early forties, and Daniel A. Nicholson, in his late fifties, began living together in 1985 and were married in 1989. They separated in June 1994 and divorced in June 1996. Throughout their cohabitation, the parties lived in a house owned by Nicholson. Wolfe has been a teacher in Anchorage for over twelve years and earns about $58,600 per year. For the first five years of their…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hansen v. HansenAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API