Nicholson v. Wolfe
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
Daniel A. Nicholson appeals the trial court’s division of property. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further consideration.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Deborah K. Wolfe, now in her early forties, and Daniel A. Nicholson, in his late fifties, began living together in 1985 and were married in 1989. They separated in June 1994 and divorced in June 1996. Throughout their cohabitation, the parties lived in a house owned by Nicholson. Wolfe has been a teacher in Anchorage for over twelve years and earns about $58,600 per year. For the first five years of their…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Hansen v. HansenAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.