Legal Opinion

Mendonca Dairy v. Mauldin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1966No. 41713PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, 85 O.S. 1961, § 1 et seq., claimant, Travis E. Mauldin, filed his claim for compensation before the State Industrial Court on January 27, 1965, alleging injury sustained February 22, 1964, arising out of and in the course of employment by the' respondent Verda Van Hook and Verda Van Hook, executrix, doing business as Mendonca Dairy. The respondent denied that claimant was an employee of the respondent, denied injury connected with the employment of claimant by respondent, and denied notice.

The cause was tried…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. MouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. WB Johnston Grain Company v. SelfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Anderson v. DukesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Smith Brothers Road Construction Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Carpenter Electric Co. v. DrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Price v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Crall v. HockmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Boren v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Central Plains Construction v. HicksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Waller v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API