Legal Opinion

Price v. Howard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 2010No. 105,943PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, J.:

¶ 1 We retained this cause to answer two questions: 1) whether the various defendants/appellees are entitled to the protection of the exclusive remedy provision1 of the OMahoma Workers’ Compensation Act; and 2) if so, whether the actions of the respective parties were sufficient to take them outside that protection under this Court’s opinion in Parret v. UNICCO Service Co., 2005 OK 54, 127 P.3d 572.

¶ 2 The employee, ServiCenter’s President, and a majority stockholder in the company were killed when the airplane crashed. There is no evidence that the pilot or any of the other…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Ex Parte EssarySupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Monge v. RG Petro-Machinery (Group) Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Martinez v. Angel Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API