Legal Opinion

Central Plains Construction v. Hickson

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1998No. 90186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

¶ 1 After he was injured in an attack by a co-worker, Claimant Dennis Hickson filed a workers’ compensation claim naming Central Plains Construction (Central Plains) as his employer. Subsequently, Central Plains moved to join C.J. Tate & Sons (Tate), contending Tate was the actual employer. Tate ultimately agreed that Claimant was its employee but argued that it was engaged in a joint venture with Central Plains on the project on which Claimant worked.

¶ 2 After hearing, the Workers’ Compensation Court trial judge entered an order containing special findings that Central…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Odyssey/Americare of Oklahoma v. WordenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. WB Johnston Grain Company v. SelfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Price v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Geneva Langworthy v. Alternative Humane Society And Adam P. KarpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Hock v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Price v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API