Waller v. Keene
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
This case raises the narrow question whether a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance, issued to an individual employer, affords protection to the same insured against claims of an employee of a subsequently formed partnership of which the insured is a member engaged in the same or a similar business. 1 The Workmen’s Compensation Commission (the Commission) held that it did; the Circuit Court for Baltimore County held that it did not and entered judgment reversing the order of the Commission. The Court of Special Appeals in Waller v. Keene, 26 Md. App. 367, 338 A. 2d 355 (1975) affirmed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reed v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- David v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Brollier v. Van AlstineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- Toenberg v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greycoat Hanover F Street Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Scott v. Edwards Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Scott v. Edwards Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Scott v. Edwards Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991