Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Dukes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1943No. 30966PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

On the 25th day of October, 1941, R. S. Dukes, hereinafter called respondent, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation, stating that he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with Forest Anderson. Thereafter, on the 1st day of April, 1942, the State Industrial Commission entered its award for compensation, from which order the Tri-State Casualty Insurance Company alone has appealed.

The petitioner (insurance carrier) contends that it is not liable for the reason that it carried a contract of insurance issued to Forest Anderson,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore & Gleason v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. El Reno Broom Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Hassen v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. New York Indemnity Ins. Co. v. FerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. MouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. WB Johnston Grain Company v. SelfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Rosamond Construction Company v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Young v. City of HoldenvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Mendonca Dairy v. MauldinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API