Legal Opinion

Boren v. Scott

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1996No. 86749PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOPLIN, Judge:

Appellant Myra Boren seeks review of the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellee Douglas Scott, d/b/a Scott’s Country Store (Scott) in Boren’s action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, Darrell Boren (Decedent). We agree with the trial court that, as a matter of law, Scott is immune from tort liability under the OHahoma Workers Compensation Act, 85 O.S.1991 § 12, and, accordingly, affirm.

Scott opened a convenience store in 1986 and entered into an agreement with Cross & Sons, Inc. (Cross), to install gasoline storage tanks,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Martin v. Chapel, Wilkinson, Riggs, and AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Harter Concrete Products, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. WB Johnston Grain Company v. SelfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Shawnee v. Clarke & Van Wagner, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Central Plains Construction v. HicksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Boren v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Brown v. Kruger Family Holdings, II, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Rogers v. Mid-America Door, Fire & Casualty Ins. of ConnecticutCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API