Legal Opinion
Donnellan v. City of Novato
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 2001No. A090263PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J. *
John Donnellan (appellant) is a police officer employed by the City of Novato. He filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1094.5, seeking judicial review of a decision by the City Council of the City of Novato (City Council) suspending him for four days without pay. The trial court denied the petition on the ground that it was barred by the limitations provision in section 1094.6, subdivision (b), because it was filed more than 90 days after the date the City Council’s decision became “final,” which the trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & RothbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Common Wealth Insurance Systems, Inc. v. KerstenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Dolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Citizens for a Better Eureka v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Carloss v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Esther Blaich v. West Hollywood Rent Stabilization DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Liang v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.