Legal Opinion

Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & Rothberg

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1985No. L.A. 31910PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Does section 340.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure permit a minor subjected to professional negligence at the hands of a health care provider a period of at least three years from the date of the wrongful act in which to file his action, regardless of when he reached the age of majority?

I

This is an action for legal malpractice. Plaintiff, George Steketee, alleges that defendant law firm and two of its members negligently failed to file an action for medical malpractice on his behalf within the period established by Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5.

The parties stipulated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API