Legal Opinion
Citizens for a Better Eureka v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2011No. A129873PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1580Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
A developer planned an extensive marina project on a 43-acre site near Humboldt Bay in the City of Eureka (City). This case concerns the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission (Commission) over phase 1 of the proposed mixed-use development project. The City, having issued nuisance abatement orders concerning the site, finally issued a coastal development permit (CDP) for phase 1. The CDP has been appealed to the Commission. Plaintiff Citizens for a Better Eureka (CBE) is challenging the Commission’s appellate jurisdiction over the CDP.
At issue is Public…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bickel v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Pacific Lumber Co. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dunn v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bolsa Chica Land Trust v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Dana Point v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hubbard v. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- City of Dana Point v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Dana Point v. Cal. Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.