Legal Opinion
Carloss v. County of Alameda
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 12, 2015No. A143531PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, Acting P. J.
The County of Alameda (county) seized and sold residential property that was in default on property taxes. The sale proceeds exceeded the tax delinquency. Jerome Carloss, the son of the deceased former resident of the property, filed a claim with the county for the excess proceeds under a statute that permits a “person with title of record” to tax-defaulted property or the person’s successor to claim sale proceeds in excess of the tax liability. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 4675, subds. (a), (e)(1)(B), (f).) Carloss’s mother was listed as the property owner in county tax…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cmtys. for a Better Env't v. State Energy Res. Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- State of Cal. Dtsc v. Westside Delivery LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Cnty. of Sonoma v. Gustely, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Communities for Better Environment v. St. Energy Res.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- County of Sonoma v. GustelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.