Legal Opinion

Liang v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 2004No. A106280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAY, P. J.

In November of 2000, Lillian Liang began renting an apartment for $750 per month. In April of 2002 Liang petitioned under San Francisco’s rent control ordinance to have her rent halved on account of habitability problems. Her petition was denied by an administrative law judge. Liang appealed to the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board (Board). On November 7, 2002, Liang was advised by mailed notice that the Board had denied her appeal on October 29 and that she had “90 calendar days of the date of mailing this notice” to seek judicial review.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sierra Club, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. City of Pomona v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Reese v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Beresford Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Save Our Bay, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pinto Lake MHP LLC v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Wilson v. Douglas CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API