Legal Opinion

Hewlings v. State

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1908No. S.F. No. 4596PublishedCited by 39 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County directing payment of a collateral inheritance, tax. M. H. Hyland, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Elizabeth Hewlett Martin, a resident of this: state, died in the county of Santa Clara on January 2, 1905, leaving a valuable estate. By the terms of her will, which was-duly probated, she bequeathed to each of the appellants a sum of money greater than five hundred dollars, amounting-in the aggregate to $38,415.21. None of the appellants was related to the deceased in a degree nearer than that of brother, and, hence, the legacy came within the terms of the act of 1903 (Stats. 1903, p. 268), amending section 1 of the act imposing a tax on inheritance devises and legacies. Section 27 of an act…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Trippet v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Anding v. LevyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Howlett v. CheethamWashington Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. EscobarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Sekt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API