Kennedy v. McDougal
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco fixing an inheritance tax upon the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Campbell, Metson, Drew, Oatman & McKenzie, for Alice Kennedy, as Widow and Executrix, Appellant and Respondent. Hartley F. Peart, for John E. McDougal, Treasurer of the City and County of San Francisco, Respondent and Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
These are separate appeals by the treasurer of the city and county of San Francisco and Alice Kennedy, surviving wife of deceased, from an order fixing the amount of inheritance tax to be paid by Mrs. Kennedy under the provisions of the act- of March 20, 1905 (Stats. 1905, p. 341), and directing payment thereof.
Deceased died testate, giving by his will all his property to his wife. The value of all his property was $82,752.50. The debts of deceased and the expenses and charges of administration, exclusive of family allowance, aggregated in amount $9,975.93. Under an order for family allowance…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re the Estate of GihonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In re the Estate of WilmerdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Estate of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Crocker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.