Legal Opinion

Trippet v. State

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1906No. L.A. No. 1870PublishedCited by 41 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought by the executor of the will of Jacob Gruendike, deceased, pursuant to the provisions of the act, approved March 20, 1905, (Stats. 1905, p. 374,) authorizing the bringing of an action against the state by the personal representatives of a decedent for the purpose of having it determined that any property belonging to such decedent’s estate is not subject to any lien for taxes under the act of 1893, and the acts amendatory thereof, imposing a tax on collateral inheritances. (Stats. 1893, p. 193.)

Prom the allegations of the complaint it appears that Jacob Gruendike, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Brenham v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API