Legal Opinion
Mannheim v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1970No. L.A. 29776PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, J.
Petitioner Sid Mannheim seeks a writ of mandate to compel the probate court to enter a supplemental order distributing to his clients 1 the unallocated portion of the estate of Janet Nieto, pursuant to section 228, as amended, of the Probate Code. 2
Janet Nieto died intestate in Los Angeles on March 19, 1968. Her estate is being administered by the public administrator. In December 1968 petitioner as attorney for the five heirs of decedent’s predeceased husband filed a petition to determine heirship. In response to this petition, the probate court on May 29, 1969, entered…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.