Legal Opinion

Sekt v. Justice's Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1945No. S. F. 17140PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, J. pro tem.

A. A. Sekt petitions for a writ of prohibition to restrain the Justice’s Court of San Rafael township from carrying into effect a judgment and sentence imposed by it on petitioner. It is his contention that before the judgment against him became final the law under which he was convicted was repealed, with the result, so he urges, that there is no law under which he now may be lawfully imprisoned.

In February of 1943 petitioner and one Phillip Webster were charged by complaint with the misdemeanor of having violated section 182 of the Penal Code (conspiracy to commit a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Malloy v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. People v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Murphy v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. NasalgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API