Legal Opinion
Diemer v. Carlson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1996No. C4-96-873PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
On petition of Charles Diemer filed pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 204B.44, we exercise our original jurisdiction to consider the recurring question of the authority of the governor to appoint a qualified person to fill a vacancy created by the retirement of a judge, in this case the Honorable Gerald W. Kalina. Petition denied.
Judge Gerald W. Kalina, having served as a judge of the Dakota County Court for the period from 1972 to 1983, was appointed as a district judge of the First Judicial District on April 25, 1983. He was thereafter elected to that position in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gardner v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Putnam v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Rice v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Enger v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zettler v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Clark v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Diemer v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.