Legal Opinion
Enger v. Holm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 23, 1942No. Nos. 33,421, 33,422PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Two proceedings in mandamus. One is to compel the secretary of state to accept relator’s nomination by petition to fill by election not in regular course but under the provisions of Minn. Const, art. 6, § 10, for the filling of vacancies in judicial office, the vacancy in the office of associate justice of this. court created by the death of the late Mr. Justice Royal- A. Stone. The other is to compel the same official to accept relator’s nomination by petition not to fill the vacancy in the office mentioned under the constitutional provision for the filling of. vacancies in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Helvering v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State ex rel. Smallwood v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Peterson v. StaffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Cashman v. HedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Clark v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Hennepin County Bar Assn. v. AmdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.