Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 2010No. A10-501PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This matter comes before the court on a petition filed by petitioners Jill Clark, Heather Robins, and Gregory Wersal pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 204B.44 (2008), seeking an order directing the Minnesota Secretary of State to accept filings for the office of Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court for the November 2010 general election. Petitioners contend that the Secretary of State is obligated under Article VI, Sections 7 and 8, of the Minnesota Constitution to place the chief justice seat on the November 2010 ballot and that the failure to post the chief justice seat…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Renne v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. State Ex Rel. Putnam v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. State v. HohenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Robins v. RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Schowalter v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API