Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Putnam v. Holm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1927No. 26,334PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quashing and dismissing an alternative writ of mandamus issued in a proceeding to have the respondents, who are state officials, authenticate and promulgate senate file No. 137,.which was a bill in the 1927 legislature relating to the salary of district judges. The bill passed both houses and was presented to the governor on Wednesday, April 13, 1927. On April 18,1927, the governor returned it, with his written objections, to the lieutenant governor while presiding over the senate.

April 15 was Good Friday, which is a legal holiday in this state. April 17 was…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Harless v. HatchIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Harpending v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. State ex rel. Crenshaw v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Miller v. HurfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. State ex rel. State Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. MichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Gardner v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Redmond v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Clark v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API