Legal Opinion
Rice v. Connolly
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1992No. C6-92-8PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Chief Justice.
On petition of James I. Rice for a writ of quo warranto, 1 we remanded these proceedings to the Ramsey County District Court for its consideration of the petitioner’s implicit challenge to the constitutionality of both 1991 Minn.Laws ch. 336, art. I amending Minn.Stat. §§ 240.01-240.29 (Supp. 1991), expanding the licensing authority of the Minnesota Racing Commission, and Minnesota R. 7873.0400 (1991) which details the requirements for telephone account wagering. We hold that because article X, section 8 of the Minnesota Constitution explicitly limits legislative…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Gardner v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Mattson v. KiedrowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Williams v. RolfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Clark v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Schowalter v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HartmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. LessleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.