Legal Opinion

Diemer v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1996No. C4-96-873Published

1Opinion of the Court

550 N.W.2d 875 (1996)

Charles DIEMER, Petitioner,

v.

Arne H. CARLSON, Governor, and Joan Anderson Growe, Secretary of State, Respondents.

No. C4-96-873.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 28, 1996.

Charles Diemer, Inver Grove Heights, Pro Se.

Alan I. Gilbert, Office of the Attorney General, St. Paul, for Respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

On petition of Charles Diemer filed pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 204B.44, we exercise our original jurisdiction to consider the recurring question of the authority of the governor to appoint a qualified person to fill a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  4. Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Women of the State v. GomezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API