Legal Opinion

Shearer v. Shearer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1985No. 84-248PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrey, J.

This case requires us to evaluate the entire concept of intrafamilial immunity since it involves both a husband and wife suit and a parent and child suit.

Oversimply, the reasons advanced in favor of intrafamilial immunity are based on two considerations. The first is a public policy argument that the courts should not interfere with the basic social unit, the family, nor promote any rule which interferes with the harmonious conduct of the family’s affairs. The second is economic, i.e., that intrafamilial suits will lead to a drain on the family finances, or fraud and collusion, or perhaps…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State Farm Automobile Insurance v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Scott v. Bank One Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dairyland Insurance v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Frye v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Heino v. HarperOregon Supreme Court · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API