United States v. International Forwarding Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
This case was decided by this court on the 6th day of March, 1925, and the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers was affirmed. A rehearing has been granted, and the one question involved has been discussed and considered at much greater length. The imported articles in question are finished necklaces made of mother-of-pearl beads strung on substantial double silk cords and fastened with brass clasps.
The beads are graduated in size from about one-eighth of an inch in diameter at the ends of the necklaces to more than one-half of an inch in the center. The beads are apparently true…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Goldberg's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. CohnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. Mandel Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.