Davies v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District dismissing appellant’s bill, filed under section 4915, Rev.St. as amended (35 U.S.C.A. § 63), to authorize the issuance of a patent.
Appellant seeks a decree authorizing appellee to issue to him a patent for a superfluous hair remover. Claims 14 to 22, inclusive, are involved. Of these, 14 to 17, inclusive, are for an article of manufacture; and claims 18 to 22, inclusive, are for the method.
Claims 14 and 18, illustrative of the two groups, are here reproduced:
“14. An article of manufacture, - comprising a hair…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- In re EkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Wach v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. DaviesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- General Tire and Rubber Company v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
- Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- General Foods Corp. v. Perk Foods Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.