Legal Opinion
Kelley v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 19, 1938No. 6973PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
. MILLER, Associate Justice.
On January 13, 1933, appellant George S. Kelley filed with the Commissioner of Patents an application for a patent upon claims involving new and useful improvements in methods of dust removal. The twenty-one claims of the application were rejected by the Examiner on the ground that they showed no invention over the prior art. The Board of Appeals affirmed the Examiner’s rejection. Two petitions for rehearing were filed before the Board; the first was denied and the second was dismissed. Kelley and Kadco Corporation — a successor in intei'est — thereupon commenced *436su…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams Iron Works Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'N OF ARIZ. v. Bruce Church, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Borman v. O'DONLEYMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Tietig v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.