Legal Opinion
General Tire and Rubber Company v. Watson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 9, 1960No. Civ. A. 1806-57PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is an action against the Commissioner of Patents under 35 U.S.C. § 145, to secure an adjudication that the plaintiffs are entitled to a patent on an application that had been rejected by him. The applicants for the patent are Emert S. Pfau, Gilbert W. Swart, and Kermit V. Weinstock. The application is numbered 196584 and was filed on November 20, 1950. It was assigned by mesne assignments to the corporate plaintiff, the General Tire and Rubber Company.
The invention lies in the field of synthetic rubber. The specific invention claimed is an article of manufacture.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Thomas J. AllenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hunger-Ford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In re EkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- United Parts Manufacturing Company v. Lee Motor Products, Inc., and Joseph KuminCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
- The General Tire & Rubber Co. v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., the Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. The General Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
- Kollsman v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
- General Electric Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.