Legal Opinion

In re Ek

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 2, 1927No. 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents denying the patentability of an invention expressed in the following claim:

“A package of paper towels comprising a plurality of towels of uniform size and shape, each of said towels having a multiplicity of folds intermediate its ends, the end flaps of each towel extending in opposite directions and of less width than the remaining portions, said end flaps extending in opposite dire'etions and being of equal width allowing interfolding of adjacent towels no matter what faces of the towels may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Trussell Mfg. Co. v. Wilson-Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. General Tire and Rubber Company v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  4. Davies v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  5. In Re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API