Legal Opinion

Wach v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 25, 1935No. 6252PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District dismissing appellant’s bill, filed under the provisions of section 4915, R. S., as amended (35 USCA § 63), against the Commissioner of Patents, seeking to “authorize” the issuance of a patent to appellant.

Appellant’s application was filed April 6, 1926, and on June 20, 1930, the three claims then in the application were finally .rejected by the Principal Examiner. The rejection was affirmed by the Board of Appeals; whereupon the present suit was brought.

Of the three claims (Nos. 14, 15, and 16), claim 14 is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Lucke v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  5. In re CoykendallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Electrons, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Davies v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Poulsen v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Alexander Anderson, Inc. v. EastmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API