Legal Opinion
S. S. Kresge Co. v. Davies
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1940No. Nos. 11642, 11643PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
These are patent infringement suits brought by the appellee, James 0. Davies, as plaintiff below, owner of Davies patent, No. 2,040,599, for a certain invention in "superfluous hair removers." The bills of complaint were substantially identical, each alleging infringement. The answers denied the validity of the patent and likewise denied infringement. The suits were consolidated for purpose of trial. The lower court held the patent to be valid and infringed as to all of its claims by the sale of a sandpaper product known as the "E-Z Hair Removing Glove" manufactured by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Reflectolyte Co. v. Luminous Unit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Davies v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
3Cited by12 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1978
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Stuart Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.