Legal Opinion

Vivian v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 10, 2003No. AC 22472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The plaintiff, James R. Vivian, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Clinton (board). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly affirmed the decision of the board because (1) the zoning permit application1 (application) did not indicate the location of either the existing or the proposed septic system, as required by the Clinton zoning regulations (regulations), (2) the proposed addition would violate the setback requirements of the regulations and (3) the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Gregorio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Carlson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of EssexConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Balf Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Dipietro v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Mountain Brook Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Cunningham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Stamford v. Ten Rugby Street, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API