Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 25, 1969PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.

The intervening plaintiffs, hereinafter called the plaintiffs, have appealed from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing their appeal from the action of the defendant zoning board of appeals. The hoard granted a variance to the defendant Sabin Waluk permitting him to sell gasoline on his property, which is in a two-acre residential zone in Berlin. The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence of hardship to warrant the granting of a variance.

Waluk began to operate an automobile service garage in a rural area of Berlin in either 1932 or 1934. The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. Ward v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Garibaldi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Rural Water Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Talarico v. ConklingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API