State v. Zink

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Roger Zink appealed from the judgment entered on a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (“DUI”). Zink argues the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the DUI charge or suppress evidence because law enforcement did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion that Zink violated the law or was about to violate the law. We affirm, concluding sufficient competent evi*162dence supports the district court’s decision to deny Zink’s motion.

I

[¶ 2] A Burleigh County Sheriffs deputy stopped Zink’s…