Legal Opinion

State v. MOHL

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2010No. 20100009PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Corey Allen Mohl appeals from the judgment entered on a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Mohl argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because law enforcement did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion that Mohl violated the law or was about to violate the law. We affirm, concluding the officer had reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop Mohl’s vehicle.

I

[¶ 2] On April 12, 2009, Mohl was driving approximately five miles west of Man-dan on Highway B-94. An officer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Salter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. DorendorfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Abernathey v. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. AddaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kappel v. Director, ND Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Pesanti v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. ZinkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. JamesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. OstbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API