Legal Opinion

State v. James

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2016No. 20150111PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bo James appeals from a judgment entered after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence and he conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence. • We conclude sufficient evidence established reasonable and artic-ulable suspicion to stop James’s vehicle. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On June 9, 2014, at about 2 a.m., Sergeant Ficken was oh duty in Watford City. Ficken heard a semitruck continuously honking or blowing its horn. When he looked in the direction of the sound, he observed a Dodge pickup pulling a stock trailer traveling westbound in front of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Salter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Zimmerman v. North Dakota Department of Transportation DirectorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. DorendorfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MorsetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. City of West Fargo v. MedberyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. DowdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. SuelzleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. SullivanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API