Millsaps v. WILKES CONTRACTING COMPANY
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Although a brief was filed on behalf of third-party defendants State Highway Commission and Spangler, no appeal was perfected from the summary judgment in their favor. Therefore, the question for determination is: “Did the trial court err in entering summary judgment in favor of defendant Wilkes?” We hold that it did not.
In Moore v. Clark, 235 N.C. 364, 70 S.E. 2d 182 (1952), opinion by Ervin, Justice, quoted with approval in Highway Commission v. Reynolds Co., 272 N.C. 618, 624, 159 S.E. 2d 198, 203 (1968), we find the following:
“A contractor who is employed by the State Highway…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Griffith v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- State v. . GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. ChantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Brice v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Ipock v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In the Matter of Will of EdgertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.