In the Matter of Will of Edgerton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The essence of this appeal is whether it was proper to grant summary judgment dismissing the caveat. Summary judgment is proper where “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56.
Propounders maintain that caveator executed a renunciation and release to any interest in decedent’s estate, and, pursuant to G.S. 31-32, caveator no longer has standing to file a caveat.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whitley v. CubberlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Millsaps v. WILKES CONTRACTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Van Poole v. MesserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- In Re the Last Will & Testament of LomaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Greene v. . GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re the Will of CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Figure Eight Beach Homeowners' Ass'n v. Raymond Clifton ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Ward v. Durham Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- In Re Will of JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- McDowell v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.