Griffith v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This matter arises on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The complaint sets forth causes of action in three counts. Plaintiff alleges that he is an independent radio station representative; that in September 1941, and on various occasions thereafter until December 1942, he obtained written orders from the Tom Westwood Advertising Agency, acting for the account of the Hebrew Evangelization Society, Inc., for the purchase of radio advertising time on defendant’s-radio station;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Bagley v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.