Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Town of Westport
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 1, 1998No. AC 17032PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The issues in this appeal by the plaintiff are whether the trial court incorrectly found abandonment of an easement created by deed and whether the trial court was incorrect in failing to find an easement by implication. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are not in dispute. In 1965, the plaintiff, Barbara Friedman, and her husband, Drew Friedman, acquired property known as 39 Imperial Avenue, Westport, together with a right-of-way to use a driveway twenty feet wide on property that was originally 41-43 Imperial Avenue, which is now part of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Carothers v. CapozzielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Glotzer v. KeyesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- D'AMATO v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Simone v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- McManus v. RoggiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Pender v. MatrangaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Utay v. G.C.S. Realty, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.