Legal Opinion

Rischall v. Bauchmann

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 4, 1946PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs by this action sought to enjoin the defendant from interfering with their use of a concrete walk leading from their house across the defendant’s intervening land to the westerly sidewalk of Broad Street in Meriden. The plaintiffs claim that the sale to them of this residence property by the common owner, prior to his sale of the intervening property to the defendant, was made under circumstances which created an easement by implied grant entitling them to use this existing concrete walk, their only means of access to Broad Street. From judgment in their favor the defendant has…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Robinson v. ClappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Whiting v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  4. Manning v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1826
  5. Myers v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. D'AMATO v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Boyd v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Stankiewicz v. Miami Beach Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API