Legal Opinion
McManus v. Roggi
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 29, 2003No. AC 21035PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant, Linda D. Roggi, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, Patrick J. McManus and Kathleen M. McManus. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly found that (1) the plaintiffs had obtained a prescriptive easement over the paved area located between the houses of the parties, (2) the paved area was a part of Owens Lane in Glastonbury, (3) the plaintiffs did not abandon a portion of the existing express right-of-way, (4) the defendant was estopped from denying the plaintiffs the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Sullivan v. DelisaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Slack v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Stancuna v. ShermanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Simone v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.