Legal Opinion

In Re Washer

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1927No. Docket No. Crim. 2933PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Petitioner was convicted and imprisoned for violation of the statute known as the “Usury Act,” the complaint alleging that he “did wilfully and unlawfully ask, demand, receive, take, accept and charge of and from” certain individuals more than twelve per cent per annum on a $7,000 loan “for the forbearance, use and loan of said sum of money; payment . . . being secured by an evidence of debt, to wit: a trust deed upon real property . . . and by a promissory note” executed in favor of petitioner.

The district court of appeal rendered a decision discharging the writ of habeas corpus and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Cavender v. HewittTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Beneficial Loan Society, Ltd. v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. In Re Shafter-Wasco Irr. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API