Beneficial Loan Society, Ltd. v. Haight
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
The underlying purpose of this proceeding in mandate is to test the validity of certain provisions of the Personal Property Brokers Act, as amended by the legislature in 1931 (Stats. 1931, p. 558), particularly the provisions of sections 2 and 3 thereof, which are alleged to be in conflict with the provisions of the Usury Law (Stats. 1919, p. lxxxiii).
Petitioner is a personal property broker, engaged in the business of loaning or advancing money in sums of $300 and less and taking as security for such loan or advance a chattel mortgage, bill of sale, or other obligation involving the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Pennie v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Porten v. University of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.