Legal Opinion

O. A. Graybeal Co. v. Cook

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1931No. Docket No. 4225PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This cause is before us on appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants in an action where the plaintiff sought to recover a penalty, as provided by the second subdivision of section 3 of the Initiative Act, adopted at the general election, held on November 5, 1918, covering the subject of usury. (Deering’s Gen. Laws 1923, part 1, p. 1384, Act No. 3757.)

By reason of the fact that the findings of the trial court simply negative the allegations of plaintiff’s amended complaint, it is necessary to summarize the different paragraphs set forth in said complaint.

The first and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houghton v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Nichols v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. In Re WasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Lloyd v. KeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
  5. Thayer v. TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Rose v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Advance Industrial Finance Co. v. Western Equities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API