Legal Opinion
Flanagan v. Blumenthal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 12, 2003No. SC 16634PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The defendants, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and the state of Connecticut, appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to dismiss, on the ground of sovereign immunity, the claim of the plaintiff, Robert C. Flanagan, a former Superior Court judge, seeking reimbursement, pursuant *352to General Statutes § 5-141d,3 for legal fees and expenses he had incurred while defending against a civil rights action filed against him by another state employee.4 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly determined that § 5-*353141d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Martinez v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- St. George v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Prime Publishers, Inc. v. American-Republican, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Cuozzo v. Town of OrangeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Ellis v. Allied Snow Plowing, Removal & Sanding Services Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Flanagan v. BlumenthalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Ruisi v. O'SULLIVANConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.